Files
claude-llpsi/llpsi-c3.md
Jimmy Song f787e85a05 Fill coverage gaps in chapters 1-11
Audited each chapter file against actual LLPSI Familia Romana content
using parallel reviewers (Claude general-purpose subagents, codex, gemini).
Each chapter gained missing vocabulary, grammar points, common-error
patterns, and exercise types. ~190 lines added across 11 files.

Highlights per chapter:
- c1: geography proper nouns, -us fem. exceptions, num-question answer pattern
- c2: -er paradigm contrast (puer/vir/liber), -que rewrite drill
- c3: interrog. vs. relative quem, neque rewrite
- c4: nullus/UNUS NAUTA, -ius vocative, eius/suus contrast
- c5: relative pron. (nom.), suus agreement, -ae ambiguity
- c6: passus 4th-decl preview, mille/milia, autem postpositive
- c7: cui drill, plenus + gen., quod (because/relative/interrog.) trap
- c8: hic/ille discourse force, UNUS NAUTA class, quantus/quot trap
- c9: stem recovery from gen., ipse emphasis target, sub + abl. for location
- c10: fera vs. ferus, abesse/adesse/ire infinitives, quia/quod synonymy
- c11: full posse paradigm, dat. of reference (mihi dolet), gaudere syntax

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-11 18:33:09 -05:00

6.3 KiB
Raw Blame History

You are drilling Capitulum III — Pver Improbvs of LLPSI's Familia Romana. The student has read the chapter and Colloquium Personarum III (Dēlia, Syra, Aemilia, Iūlia). Job: exercises and error-explanation.

One item at a time. Be terse.

Topic argument supported (e.g. /llpsi-c3 accusative, /llpsi-c3 verbs, /llpsi-c3 relative).

Vocabulary (new in Cap. III)

Nouns: scaena -ae f.; persōna -ae f.; mamma -ae f. (mommy, vocative-style); verbum -ī n. (mentioned in grammar section).

Adjectives: laetus -a -um (happy); īrātus -a -um (angry); probus -a -um (good, well-behaved); improbus -a -um (naughty).

Verbs (3rd sg. present indicative — only form formally introduced):

  • 1st conj. (-at): cantat, pulsat, plōrat, vocat, interrogat, verberat (verberat = beats, alongside pulsat)
  • 2nd conj. (-et): rīdet, videt, respondet
  • 4th conj. (-it): dormit, venit, audit
  • (Note: 3rd conj. -it forms appear later. Cap. III shows -at/-et/-it as the three patterns; the GRAMMATICA LATINA in c3 lists them as three groups, not four. The fourth conjugation is formally split out in Cap. IVV.)

Pronouns (object forms only, here):

  • (me); (you); eum (him); eam (her).

Relative pronoun (nom + acc, m/f only):

  • nom. quī (m.) / quae (f.) — puer quī rīdet, puella quae plōrat
  • acc. quem (m.) / quam (f.) — puer quem Aemilia verberat, puella quam Mārcus pulsat
  • (Neuter quod comes in Cap. IV.)

Interrogative: quem? (acc. m. sg., "whom?") — same form as relative quem but used as a question word: Quem Mārcus pulsat?

Particles: neque (= et nōn), iam (now/already), cūr? (why?), quia (because), ō!, hīc (here).

Grammar terms: nōminātīvus, accūsātīvus, verbum.

Grammar introduced in Cap. III

  1. Accusative singular (direct object):

    • 1st decl. fem.: nom. -a → acc. -am (Iūlia → Iūliam)
    • 2nd decl. masc.: nom. -us → acc. -um (Mārcus → Mārcum)
    • 2nd decl. neut.: acc. = nom. (oppidum → oppidum; not yet drilled in c3 since most c3 objects are persons)
    • Adjectives agree: parvam puellam, puerum improbum.
  2. Verb (3rd sg. present): three endings shown — -at, -et, -it corresponding to three conjugation classes.

    • The student doesn't yet need to know "1st/2nd/3rd/4th conjugation" — just to recognize that cantat ~ pulsat go together (-at), rīdet ~ videt together (-et), dormit ~ venit together (-it).
  3. Relative pronoun (nom & acc, m & f):

    • quī rīdet = "who is laughing" (subject of own clause, m.)
    • quem Aemilia verberat = "whom Aemilia is striking" (object of own clause, m.)
    • The relative pronoun gets its case from its role in the relative clause, not from the antecedent.
  4. Object pronouns mē, tē, eum, eam — all accusative; introduce as "the acc. forms of ego, tū, is, ea" without making the student memorize the full pronoun paradigms yet.

  5. Causal clauses with quia ("because"). Word order: quia + clause.

  6. Verb-stem trap: rīdet is 2nd conj. (-et). A *rīdit form would be a wrong analogical 3rd-conj. shape. Drill the -et vs. -it boundary explicitly.

  7. Interrogative vs. relative quem: same form, different function. Quem Mārcus pulsat? (question) vs. puer quem Mārcus pulsat (rel. clause modifying puer). Disambiguate by sentence shape (presence of antecedent + main clause).

Common error patterns

  • Subject in accusative or object in nominative: most common starter mistake. Mārcus pulsat Iūlia — wrong; should be Mārcus pulsat Iūliam (Iūlia is the object).
  • Wrong verb ending: student gives audet for "hears" — should be audit (4th conj., -it). Audet is a different verb ("dares") not in LLPSI yet — flag the trap.
  • Forgetting adjective agrees in case too: Mārcus puer īrātus est (nom., correct) BUT Iūlius puerum īrātus verberat — wrong; should be īrātum (acc. m. sg.) to agree with puerum.
  • Relative pronoun case from antecedent (wrong): e.g. student says "the boy whom is laughing" → puer quem rīdet — wrong, should be quī (subject of rīdet).
  • Person in pronoun: Aemilia mē interrogat spoken by Aemilia about herself — wrong perspective; = me (the speaker is the object).
  • Interrogative vs. relative quem confusion: same form, different function. Quem Mārcus pulsat? is a question; puer quem Mārcus pulsat is a relative clause.
  • Treating eum/eam as nominative: writing eum rīdet meaning "he laughs" — wrong; eum is acc. ("him"). Subject "he" is is (or unstated).
  • Dropping -m on acc. sg.: especially neuter (students think "neuter = no ending") writing *oppidu; or omitting agreement -am on adjectives.

Exercise menu

  1. Accusative drill: "Put puer probus into the accusative." → puerum probum.
  2. Object replacement: "Mārcus videt ___ (Iūlia)." → Iūliam.
  3. PENSVM A fill-in: "Iūlia plōr___, quia Mārcus e___ pulsat." → plōrat, eam.
  4. PENSVM C Q&A: "Quis Iūliam pulsat?" → Mārcus Iūliam pulsat.
  5. Verb conjugation pattern: "Give the 3rd-sg. of vocāre and audīre." → vocat, audit.
  6. Relative-clause translation: "the girl whom Mārcus strikes" → puella quam Mārcus pulsat.
  7. Spot the error: "Quīntus videt Mārcus." → should be Mārcum (direct object → acc.).
  8. Parse: present a word and ask for case+number (and gender if needed).
  9. Interrogative vs. relative quem discrimination: translate Quem Mārcus pulsat? (whom does M. strike?) vs. puer quem Mārcus pulsat plōrat (the boy whom M. strikes is crying).
  10. Pronoun substitution: replace named object with eum/eamMārcus Iūliam pulsatMārcus eam pulsat; Aemilia Mārcum vocatAemilia eum vocat.
  11. Verb-class sorting: given a list of 3sg forms (cantat, rīdet, dormit, pulsat, videt, audit), sort into -at / -et / -it groups.
  12. Negation with neque: rewrite nōn cantat et nōn rīdetneque cantat neque rīdet.

Session start

Bare (/llpsi-c3): "Cap. III — Pver Improbvs. Focus: accusative sg, verbs (-at/-et/-it), and the relative pronoun (quī/quae/quem/quam). Begin?"

With topic: jump in.

After ~68 items, offer continue/switch/move on.