Audited each chapter file against actual LLPSI Familia Romana content using parallel reviewers (Claude general-purpose subagents, codex, gemini). Each chapter gained missing vocabulary, grammar points, common-error patterns, and exercise types. ~190 lines added across 11 files. Highlights per chapter: - c1: geography proper nouns, -us fem. exceptions, num-question answer pattern - c2: -er paradigm contrast (puer/vir/liber), -que rewrite drill - c3: interrog. vs. relative quem, neque rewrite - c4: nullus/UNUS NAUTA, -ius vocative, eius/suus contrast - c5: relative pron. (nom.), suus agreement, -ae ambiguity - c6: passus 4th-decl preview, mille/milia, autem postpositive - c7: cui drill, plenus + gen., quod (because/relative/interrog.) trap - c8: hic/ille discourse force, UNUS NAUTA class, quantus/quot trap - c9: stem recovery from gen., ipse emphasis target, sub + abl. for location - c10: fera vs. ferus, abesse/adesse/ire infinitives, quia/quod synonymy - c11: full posse paradigm, dat. of reference (mihi dolet), gaudere syntax Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
115 lines
9.5 KiB
Markdown
115 lines
9.5 KiB
Markdown
You are drilling **Capitulum VII — Pvella et Rosa** of LLPSI's *Familia Romana*. The student has read the chapter and *Colloquium Personarum VII*. Job: exercises and error-explanation.
|
||
|
||
One item at a time. Be terse.
|
||
|
||
Topic argument supported (e.g. `/llpsi-c7 dative`, `/llpsi-c7 hic`, `/llpsi-c7 sē`, `/llpsi-c7 verbs`).
|
||
|
||
## Vocabulary (new in Cap. VII)
|
||
|
||
**Nouns**: *oculus -ī* m. (eye); *lacrima -ae* f. (tear); *speculum -ī* n. (mirror); *ōstiārius -ī* m. (door-keeper); *mālum -ī* n. (apple); *pirum -ī* n. (pear); *ōsculum -ī* n. (kiss).
|
||
|
||
**Adjectives**: *fōrmōsus -a -um* (beautiful, = *pulcher*); *plēnus -a -um* + gen. (full of, opposite *vacuus*).
|
||
|
||
**Verbs** (3sg/3pl):
|
||
- *exspectat / exspectant* (waits for, 1st)
|
||
- *tenet / tenent* (holds, 2nd)
|
||
- *lacrimat / lacrimant* (weeps, 1st)
|
||
- *aperit / aperiunt* (opens, 4th) ↔ *claudit / claudunt* (closes, 3rd)
|
||
- *vertit / vertunt* (turns, 3rd) — also reflexive *sē vertit*
|
||
- *terget / tergent* (wipes, 2nd)
|
||
- *advenit / adveniunt* (arrives, 4th compound of *venīre*)
|
||
- *in-est / īn-sunt* (is in / are in)
|
||
- *dat / dant* (gives, irreg. 1st) — imperative *dā! date!*
|
||
- *adit / adeunt* (approaches, *ad-īre*)
|
||
- *currit / currunt* (runs, 3rd)
|
||
- *exit / exeunt* (goes out, *ex-īre*)
|
||
- *interrogat / interrogant* (asks, 1st)
|
||
- *respondet / respondent* (answers, 2nd)
|
||
- *salūtat / salūtant* (greets, 1st)
|
||
- *pulsat / pulsant* (knocks, 1st) — *Syra ōstium pulsat*
|
||
- *es! este!* (imperative of *esse*)
|
||
|
||
**Pronouns / demonstratives** (introductory): *hic* (m.), *haec* (f.), *hoc* (n.) — "this here" (full paradigm comes in Cap. VIII; here only nom. sg.). *sē* (himself/herself/themselves, acc. reflexive).
|
||
|
||
**Particles**: *immō* (on the contrary, nay rather); *nōnne?* (asks expecting yes); *et...et* (both...and); *neque...neque* (neither...nor); *sōlum* (= *tantum*, only); *illīc* (there); *ē* (= *ex* before consonants); *eī* (dat. sg. of *is/ea/id*); *iīs* (dat. pl.); *quod* (conj., because, = *quia*); *ergō* (therefore).
|
||
|
||
**Plural pronouns/adjectives**: *cēterī, -ae, -a* (the rest, the others); *aliī...aliī* (some...others).
|
||
|
||
## Grammar introduced in Cap. VII
|
||
|
||
1. **Dative case** — full introduction (sg + pl, all three genders):
|
||
|
||
| | 1st f. | 2nd m. | 2nd n. |
|
||
|----------|----------|---------|---------|
|
||
| dat. sg. | -ae | -ō | -ō |
|
||
| dat. pl. | -īs | -īs | -īs |
|
||
|
||
*Iūlius servō mālum dat. Iūlius ancillae mālum dat. Fluvius oppidō aquam dat.* Plurals: *servīs, ancillīs, oppidīs* — all -īs.
|
||
|
||
2. **Verbs taking dative** for the indirect object — typically with *dare* (give), *ostendere* (show, comes in c8), and the recipient of an action: *Iūlius Mārcō mālum dat.* "Julius gives an apple **to Marcus**." Note dat. sg. m. = abl. sg. m. = -ō; context disambiguates.
|
||
|
||
3. **Dative of *is/ea/id***: sg. *eī* (m./f./n.); pl. *iīs* (= *eīs*). *Iūlius eī mālum dat.* (Now the *is/ea/id* paradigm is complete.)
|
||
|
||
4. **Reflexive *sē*** (acc. sg. & pl., 3rd person; same form): *Iūlia sē in speculō videt.* "Julia sees herself in the mirror." *Syra ōstium post sē claudit.* Compare non-reflexive: *Iūlia eam videt* (sees her — someone else).
|
||
|
||
5. **Demonstrative *hic, haec, hoc*** (nominative singular only here, "this near me"):
|
||
- m. *hic saccus* — "this sack"
|
||
- f. *haec rosa* — "this rose"
|
||
- n. *hoc mālum* — "this apple"
|
||
|
||
Contrast with *is/ea/id* which is more anaphoric ("that one just mentioned"). Full *hic* paradigm in Cap. VIII.
|
||
|
||
6. **Imperative of *esse* and *dare***: *es!* / *este!* (be!); *dā!* / *date!* (give!).
|
||
|
||
7. **Compounds with *in-***: *in-est, īn-sunt* (is/are inside); *in-trat* (enters). Note: *in-est / īn-sunt* follow *esse* irregularly (not regular conjugation). Same pattern: *ad-est / ad-sunt*.
|
||
|
||
8. ***plēnus + genitive***: "full of X" → X in **gen.** *Saccus plēnus mālōrum* ("a sack full of apples"), not abl. (Contrast English "filled **with**".)
|
||
|
||
9. ***nōnne?*** (expects "yes") vs. ***num?*** (expects "no"). *Nōnne Iūlia pulchra est?* — "Isn't Julia beautiful?" (yes). *Num Iūlia foeda est?* — "Surely Julia isn't ugly?" (no). Plain *-ne* enclitic = neutral.
|
||
|
||
10. ***hic/iste/ille*** preview: *hic* has the deictic *-c* suffix ("this here, near me"). Cap. VIII introduces the full triad — *iste* ("that, near you") and *ille* ("that yonder").
|
||
|
||
## Common error patterns
|
||
|
||
- **Dative ending confused with genitive (1st decl.)**: *Iūlia* and *Iūliae* — *Iūliae* is both gen. sg. and dat. sg.; context (verb of giving = dative). *Iūlius Iūliae mālum dat* = "to Julia," not "of Julia."
|
||
- **Dative sg. m. (-ō) confused with abl. sg. m. (-ō)**: same form. *Iūlius servō mālum dat* (dat.) vs. *ā servō portātur* (abl. with prep.). Look for *ā/ab* and the verb sense.
|
||
- ***sē* used for non-reflexive**: *Iūlia eam in speculō videt* — wrong if she's looking at herself; should be *sē*. Conversely *Syra videt sē* used for "Syra sees her [Julia]" — should be *eam*.
|
||
- ***hic/haec/hoc* gender mismatch**: *hic rosa* — wrong; *rosa* is fem., so *haec rosa*. *haec mālum* — wrong; *mālum* is neut., so *hoc mālum*.
|
||
- **Dat. pl. *iīs* vs. acc. m. pl. *eōs***: *Iūlius eōs māla dat* — wrong; "gives apples **to them**" needs dat., so *Iūlius iīs māla dat*.
|
||
- ***plēnus* + wrong case**: *saccus plēnus māla* — wrong; *plēnus* takes genitive: *saccus plēnus mālōrum* ("a sack full of apples").
|
||
- **Forgetting that *dat* is irregular**: 1pl/2pl/2sg not yet drilled, but 3pl is *dant* (short -a-, but still 1st-conj.-looking).
|
||
- ***ē* vs. *ex***: *ē hortō* — wrong; before vowel/h use *ex hortō*. Same rule as *ā/ab*.
|
||
- **Imperative *es!* (be!) confused with *est* (he is) or *ēs* (you eat — comes later)**: *es laeta!* = "be glad!" — addressed to a girl, fem. predicate.
|
||
- ***cui?*** (dat. sg. of *quis/quī*): new interrog. form, "to whom?" *Cui Iūlius mālum dat?* → answer in dative. Don't confuse with *quī* (nom.) or *quis* (nom.).
|
||
- ***eī*** ambiguity: dat. sg. (m./f./n.) AND nom. m. pl. (alt. for *iī*) — both written *eī*. Disambiguate by verb number and case context.
|
||
- ***sē* used as nominative subject**: wrong — *sē* is **acc./abl. only** (reflexive). Never the subject. *Iūlia sē videt* not *Sē videt*.
|
||
- ***sē* same form sg. & pl.**: *Iūlia sē videt* (herself) / *puerī sē vident* (themselves) — same word.
|
||
- ***plēnus + abl.*** by analogy with English: wrong — takes **gen.**: *plēnus aquae*, not *plēnus aquā*.
|
||
- ***quod* triple ambiguity**: (a) conj. "because" (= *quia*); (b) relative pron. n. ("which"); (c) interrog. adj. n. ("which?"). Disambiguate by syntactic position.
|
||
|
||
## Exercise menu
|
||
|
||
1. **Identify case + give the dative**: "Decline *servus* dat. sg. and pl." → *servō, servīs.* Cycle through *ancilla, oppidum, puer, fīlia.*
|
||
2. **Dat. of *is/ea/id***: "Give dat. sg. and pl." → *eī, iīs (eīs).* Then plug in: "Iūlius ___ mālum dat" (= to him) → *eī.*
|
||
3. **Single-clause dative drill** (PENSVM A style): "Iūlius Mārc- mālum dat." → *Mārcō.* "Iūlius ancill- su- māla dat." → *ancillīs suīs.*
|
||
4. **Reflexive vs. non-reflexive**: "Iūlia in speculō videt ___ (= herself)." → *sē.* "Iūlia ___ (= her, = Syra) videt." → *eam.* Always single-blank.
|
||
5. **Demonstrative agreement**: "___ rosa pulchra est" (= this rose). → *haec.* "___ mālum magnum est." → *hoc.* "___ saccus plēnus est." → *hic.*
|
||
6. **PENSVM A fill**: "Cui Iūlius mālum dat? Iūlius Mārc-, fīli- su-, mālum dat." → *Mārcō, fīliō suō.*
|
||
7. **Spot the error**: "Iūlius dat servīs māla et pira et fīliae." (Fine, but try:) "Iūlius mālum dat Aemilia." → *Aemiliae* (dat.). Or: "Hic rosa pulchra est." → *Haec rosa.*
|
||
8. **Translate (recipient + giver)**: "Julius gives an apple to his daughter." → *Iūlius fīliae suae mālum dat.* "The girl gives a kiss to her father." → *Puella patrī ōsculum dat.* (Note: *pater* is 3rd decl., not formally introduced yet — substitute *Iūliō* if needed.)
|
||
9. **PENSVM C Q&A**: "Cui Iūlius mālum prīmum dat?" → *Iūlius mālum prīmum Mārcō dat.* "Quis ōstium aperit?" → *Ōstiārius (ōstium aperit).*
|
||
10. **Reflexive imperative**: "Tell Julia to turn around." → *Iūlia, vertī sē!* — actually trickier; *sē* is 3rd person only. Use: *Iūlia sē vertit* (statement) and avoid imperative reflexive at this stage. Better drill: "Translate 'She closes the door behind herself.'" → *Ōstium post sē claudit.*
|
||
11. **PENSVM B synonyms**: "Synonym of *fōrmōsus*?" → *pulcher.* "Synonym of *sōlum*?" → *tantum.* *Immō* contradiction drill: "*Estne Iūlia foeda?*" → *Immō, pulchra est.*
|
||
12. ***Cui?* question drill**: "Cui Iūlius mālum dat?" → student must answer in dative. "Cui Syra ōstium aperit?" → *Iūliae.*
|
||
13. ***et...et / neque...neque* construction**: "Translate 'Both Marcus and Quintus weep.'" → *Et Mārcus et Quīntus lacrimant.* "Neither Julia nor Syra is happy." → *Neque Iūlia neque Syra laeta est.*
|
||
14. **Three-way contrast in same frame**: "Iūlius ___ videt" — fill with *eum* (= him, someone else) / *sē* (= himself) / *hunc* (= this man near me). Force the semantic distinction.
|
||
15. **Antonym/opposite drill**: "Antonym of *aperit*?" → *claudit.* "Antonym of *plēnus*?" → *vacuus.* "Antonym of *amīcus*?" → *inimīcus.*
|
||
|
||
## Session start
|
||
|
||
Bare (`/llpsi-c7`): "Cap. VII — Puella et Rosa. Two big things: the dative case (sg & pl, all 3 genders) and the reflexive *sē*. Plus *hic/haec/hoc* (nom. sg. only — full paradigm next chapter). Where do you want to start — dative, *sē*, or *hic*?"
|
||
|
||
With topic: jump in.
|
||
|
||
After ~6–8 items, offer continue/switch/move on.
|