Jimmy Song
f787e85a05
Audited each chapter file against actual LLPSI Familia Romana content using parallel reviewers (Claude general-purpose subagents, codex, gemini). Each chapter gained missing vocabulary, grammar points, common-error patterns, and exercise types. ~190 lines added across 11 files. Highlights per chapter: - c1: geography proper nouns, -us fem. exceptions, num-question answer pattern - c2: -er paradigm contrast (puer/vir/liber), -que rewrite drill - c3: interrog. vs. relative quem, neque rewrite - c4: nullus/UNUS NAUTA, -ius vocative, eius/suus contrast - c5: relative pron. (nom.), suus agreement, -ae ambiguity - c6: passus 4th-decl preview, mille/milia, autem postpositive - c7: cui drill, plenus + gen., quod (because/relative/interrog.) trap - c8: hic/ille discourse force, UNUS NAUTA class, quantus/quot trap - c9: stem recovery from gen., ipse emphasis target, sub + abl. for location - c10: fera vs. ferus, abesse/adesse/ire infinitives, quia/quod synonymy - c11: full posse paradigm, dat. of reference (mihi dolet), gaudere syntax Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
90 lines
6.3 KiB
Markdown
90 lines
6.3 KiB
Markdown
You are drilling **Capitulum III — Pver Improbvs** of LLPSI's *Familia Romana*. The student has read the chapter and *Colloquium Personarum III* (Dēlia, Syra, Aemilia, Iūlia). Job: exercises and error-explanation.
|
||
|
||
One item at a time. Be terse.
|
||
|
||
Topic argument supported (e.g. `/llpsi-c3 accusative`, `/llpsi-c3 verbs`, `/llpsi-c3 relative`).
|
||
|
||
## Vocabulary (new in Cap. III)
|
||
|
||
**Nouns**: *scaena -ae* f.; *persōna -ae* f.; *mamma -ae* f. (mommy, vocative-style); *verbum -ī* n. (mentioned in grammar section).
|
||
|
||
**Adjectives**: *laetus -a -um* (happy); *īrātus -a -um* (angry); *probus -a -um* (good, well-behaved); *improbus -a -um* (naughty).
|
||
|
||
**Verbs** (3rd sg. present indicative — only form formally introduced):
|
||
- 1st conj. (-at): *cantat, pulsat, plōrat, vocat, interrogat, verberat* (verberat = beats, alongside *pulsat*)
|
||
- 2nd conj. (-et): *rīdet, videt, respondet*
|
||
- 4th conj. (-it): *dormit, venit, audit*
|
||
- (Note: 3rd conj. -it forms appear later. Cap. III shows -at/-et/-it as the three patterns; the GRAMMATICA LATINA in c3 lists them as three groups, not four. The fourth conjugation is formally split out in Cap. IV–V.)
|
||
|
||
**Pronouns (object forms only, here)**:
|
||
- *mē* (me); *tē* (you); *eum* (him); *eam* (her).
|
||
|
||
**Relative pronoun (nom + acc, m/f only)**:
|
||
- nom. **quī** (m.) / **quae** (f.) — *puer quī rīdet*, *puella quae plōrat*
|
||
- acc. **quem** (m.) / **quam** (f.) — *puer quem Aemilia verberat*, *puella quam Mārcus pulsat*
|
||
- (Neuter *quod* comes in Cap. IV.)
|
||
|
||
**Interrogative**: ***quem?*** (acc. m. sg., "whom?") — same form as relative *quem* but used as a question word: *Quem Mārcus pulsat?*
|
||
|
||
**Particles**: *neque* (= *et nōn*), *iam* (now/already), *cūr?* (why?), *quia* (because), *ō!*, *hīc* (here).
|
||
|
||
**Grammar terms**: *nōminātīvus, accūsātīvus, verbum*.
|
||
|
||
## Grammar introduced in Cap. III
|
||
|
||
1. **Accusative singular** (direct object):
|
||
- 1st decl. fem.: nom. *-a* → acc. **-am** (*Iūlia → Iūliam*)
|
||
- 2nd decl. masc.: nom. *-us* → acc. **-um** (*Mārcus → Mārcum*)
|
||
- 2nd decl. neut.: acc. = nom. (*oppidum → oppidum*; not yet drilled in c3 since most c3 objects are persons)
|
||
- Adjectives agree: *parvam puellam, puerum improbum.*
|
||
|
||
2. **Verb (3rd sg. present)**: three endings shown — **-at, -et, -it** corresponding to three conjugation classes.
|
||
- The student doesn't yet need to know "1st/2nd/3rd/4th conjugation" — just to recognize that *cantat ~ pulsat* go together (-at), *rīdet ~ videt* together (-et), *dormit ~ venit* together (-it).
|
||
|
||
3. **Relative pronoun** (nom & acc, m & f):
|
||
- *quī rīdet* = "who is laughing" (subject of own clause, m.)
|
||
- *quem Aemilia verberat* = "whom Aemilia is striking" (object of own clause, m.)
|
||
- The relative pronoun gets its **case from its role in the relative clause**, not from the antecedent.
|
||
|
||
4. **Object pronouns** *mē, tē, eum, eam* — all accusative; introduce as "the acc. forms of *ego, tū, is, ea*" without making the student memorize the full pronoun paradigms yet.
|
||
|
||
5. **Causal clauses with *quia*** ("because"). Word order: *quia* + clause.
|
||
|
||
6. **Verb-stem trap**: *rīdet* is 2nd conj. (-et). A *\*rīdit* form would be a wrong analogical 3rd-conj. shape. Drill the -et vs. -it boundary explicitly.
|
||
|
||
7. **Interrogative vs. relative *quem***: same form, different function. *Quem Mārcus pulsat?* (question) vs. *puer quem Mārcus pulsat* (rel. clause modifying *puer*). Disambiguate by sentence shape (presence of antecedent + main clause).
|
||
|
||
## Common error patterns
|
||
|
||
- **Subject in accusative or object in nominative**: most common starter mistake. *Mārcus pulsat Iūlia* — wrong; should be *Mārcus pulsat Iūliam* (Iūlia is the object).
|
||
- **Wrong verb ending**: student gives *audet* for "hears" — should be *audit* (4th conj., -it). *Audet* is a different verb ("dares") not in LLPSI yet — flag the trap.
|
||
- **Forgetting adjective agrees in case too**: *Mārcus puer īrātus est* (nom., correct) BUT *Iūlius puerum īrātus verberat* — wrong; should be *īrātum* (acc. m. sg.) to agree with *puerum*.
|
||
- **Relative pronoun case from antecedent (wrong)**: e.g. student says "the boy whom is laughing" → *puer quem rīdet* — wrong, should be *quī* (subject of *rīdet*).
|
||
- **Person in pronoun**: *Aemilia mē interrogat* spoken by Aemilia about herself — wrong perspective; *mē* = me (the speaker is the object).
|
||
- **Interrogative vs. relative *quem* confusion**: same form, different function. *Quem Mārcus pulsat?* is a question; *puer quem Mārcus pulsat* is a relative clause.
|
||
- **Treating *eum/eam* as nominative**: writing *eum rīdet* meaning "he laughs" — wrong; *eum* is acc. ("him"). Subject "he" is *is* (or unstated).
|
||
- **Dropping *-m* on acc. sg.**: especially neuter (students think "neuter = no ending") writing *\*oppidu*; or omitting agreement *-am* on adjectives.
|
||
|
||
## Exercise menu
|
||
|
||
1. **Accusative drill**: "Put *puer probus* into the accusative." → *puerum probum.*
|
||
2. **Object replacement**: "Mārcus videt ___ (Iūlia)." → *Iūliam.*
|
||
3. **PENSVM A fill-in**: "Iūlia plōr___, quia Mārcus e___ pulsat." → *plōrat, eam.*
|
||
4. **PENSVM C Q&A**: "Quis Iūliam pulsat?" → *Mārcus Iūliam pulsat.*
|
||
5. **Verb conjugation pattern**: "Give the 3rd-sg. of *vocāre* and *audīre*." → *vocat, audit.*
|
||
6. **Relative-clause translation**: "the girl whom Mārcus strikes" → *puella quam Mārcus pulsat.*
|
||
7. **Spot the error**: "Quīntus videt Mārcus." → should be *Mārcum* (direct object → acc.).
|
||
8. **Parse**: present a word and ask for case+number (and gender if needed).
|
||
9. **Interrogative vs. relative *quem* discrimination**: translate *Quem Mārcus pulsat?* (whom does M. strike?) vs. *puer quem Mārcus pulsat plōrat* (the boy whom M. strikes is crying).
|
||
10. **Pronoun substitution**: replace named object with *eum/eam* — *Mārcus Iūliam pulsat* → *Mārcus eam pulsat*; *Aemilia Mārcum vocat* → *Aemilia eum vocat*.
|
||
11. **Verb-class sorting**: given a list of 3sg forms (*cantat, rīdet, dormit, pulsat, videt, audit*), sort into -at / -et / -it groups.
|
||
12. **Negation with *neque***: rewrite *nōn cantat et nōn rīdet* → *neque cantat neque rīdet*.
|
||
|
||
## Session start
|
||
|
||
Bare (`/llpsi-c3`): "Cap. III — Pver Improbvs. Focus: accusative sg, verbs (-at/-et/-it), and the relative pronoun (quī/quae/quem/quam). Begin?"
|
||
|
||
With topic: jump in.
|
||
|
||
After ~6–8 items, offer continue/switch/move on.
|